JavaScript is not enabled, please check your browser settings.

Our site requires JavaScript to display correctly. It may be best to either enable JavaScript in your current browser or download the latest version for one of the options below.

Google Chrome Mozilla Firefox Apple Safari (macOS) Microsoft Edge/Internet Explorer

260422 - Fred's Club

Wed Aft 499er

  • Date: 11/08/2017 (Wednesday)
  • Event Type: PAIRS
  • Session: 8 - Wednesday Afternoon
  • Class: 3 (Restricted)
  • Statification Type: HIGHEST
  • No. of Sessions: 1
  • Winner Type: 2
  • Updated: Friday, 08-Dec-2017 23:18:52 UTC
  • Rating: Club Rating Point (1)

Overalls (Section A)

Pair Names Score % mps Boards Played
1 NS Rumsey, Tish
Ruark, Beverlee
0.64 total | 0.64 black
24
2 NS Young, Judy
Manzi, Judy
24
3 NS Dean, David
Loo, Maisie
24
4 NS Parker, Betty
Hannah, Bonnie
24
5 NS Hugunine, Fran
Baxter, Marsha
24
6 NS Simpson, Mike
Healey, Joan
24
7 NS Strobel, Caroline
Garst, John
0.45 total | 0.45 black
24
8 NS Tempel, John
Tempel, Pam
0.32 total | 0.32 black
24
1 EW Bradford, Gayle
Bradford, Stephen
24
2 EW Gagliano, Victor
McKim, Don
24
3 EW Stapler, E J
Boggan, Peggy
0.64 total | 0.64 black
24
4 EW Deruelle, Ken
Lee, Marcia
24
5 EW Davis, Pat
Scott, George
24
6 EW Bridgers, Remae
Daniels, Gene
0.42 total | 0.42 black
24
7 EW Denman, Carole
Cernogorsky, Carol
0.45 total | 0.45 black
24
8 EW Cruse, Jane
Smith, Nancy
0.29 total | 0.29 black
24

Board 1

NS EW NS Score EW Score Contract Declarer Pairs
1 1 -110 110 1 - Rumsey, Tish & Ruark, Beverlee vs
1 - Bradford, Gayle & Bradford, Stephen
8 7 -110 110 8 - Tempel, John & Tempel, Pam vs
7 - Denman, Carole & Cernogorsky, Carol
7 4 -90 90 7 - Strobel, Caroline & Garst, John vs
4 - Deruelle, Ken & Lee, Marcia
6 2 -400 400 6 - Simpson, Mike & Healey, Joan vs
2 - Gagliano, Victor & McKim, Don
5 8 -110 110 5 - Hugunine, Fran & Baxter, Marsha vs
8 - Cruse, Jane & Smith, Nancy
3 5 -200 200 3 - Dean, David & Loo, Maisie vs
5 - Davis, Pat & Scott, George
4 6 -170 170 4 - Parker, Betty & Hannah, Bonnie vs
6 - Bridgers, Remae & Daniels, Gene
2 3 -110 110 2 - Young, Judy & Manzi, Judy vs
3 - Stapler, E J & Boggan, Peggy

Board 2

NS EW NS Score EW Score Contract Declarer Pairs
1 1 600 -600 1 - Rumsey, Tish & Ruark, Beverlee vs
1 - Bradford, Gayle & Bradford, Stephen
8 7 650 -650 8 - Tempel, John & Tempel, Pam vs
7 - Denman, Carole & Cernogorsky, Carol
7 4 -200 200 7 - Strobel, Caroline & Garst, John vs
4 - Deruelle, Ken & Lee, Marcia
6 2 650 -650 6 - Simpson, Mike & Healey, Joan vs
2 - Gagliano, Victor & McKim, Don
5 8 200 -200 5 - Hugunine, Fran & Baxter, Marsha vs
8 - Cruse, Jane & Smith, Nancy
3 5 140 -140 3 - Dean, David & Loo, Maisie vs
5 - Davis, Pat & Scott, George
4 6 -100 100 4 - Parker, Betty & Hannah, Bonnie vs
6 - Bridgers, Remae & Daniels, Gene
2 3 100 -100 2 - Young, Judy & Manzi, Judy vs
3 - Stapler, E J & Boggan, Peggy

Board 3

NS EW NS Score EW Score Contract Declarer Pairs
1 1 140 -140 1 - Rumsey, Tish & Ruark, Beverlee vs
1 - Bradford, Gayle & Bradford, Stephen
8 7 90 -90 8 - Tempel, John & Tempel, Pam vs
7 - Denman, Carole & Cernogorsky, Carol
7 4 100 -100 7 - Strobel, Caroline & Garst, John vs
4 - Deruelle, Ken & Lee, Marcia
6 2 110 -110 6 - Simpson, Mike & Healey, Joan vs
2 - Gagliano, Victor & McKim, Don
5 8 -50 50 5 - Hugunine, Fran & Baxter, Marsha vs
8 - Cruse, Jane & Smith, Nancy
3 5 110 -110 3 - Dean, David & Loo, Maisie vs
5 - Davis, Pat & Scott, George
4 6 100 -100 4 - Parker, Betty & Hannah, Bonnie vs
6 - Bridgers, Remae & Daniels, Gene
2 3 110 -110 2 - Young, Judy & Manzi, Judy vs
3 - Stapler, E J & Boggan, Peggy

Board 4

NS EW NS Score EW Score Contract Declarer Pairs
2 2 -140 140 2 - Young, Judy & Manzi, Judy vs
2 - Gagliano, Victor & McKim, Don
1 8 -140 140 1 - Rumsey, Tish & Ruark, Beverlee vs
8 - Cruse, Jane & Smith, Nancy
8 6 -140 140 8 - Tempel, John & Tempel, Pam vs
6 - Bridgers, Remae & Daniels, Gene
7 3 -140 140 7 - Strobel, Caroline & Garst, John vs
3 - Stapler, E J & Boggan, Peggy
6 1 -90 90 6 - Simpson, Mike & Healey, Joan vs
1 - Bradford, Gayle & Bradford, Stephen
5 7 -140 140 5 - Hugunine, Fran & Baxter, Marsha vs
7 - Denman, Carole & Cernogorsky, Carol
3 4 -100 100 3 - Dean, David & Loo, Maisie vs
4 - Deruelle, Ken & Lee, Marcia
4 5 400 -400 4 - Parker, Betty & Hannah, Bonnie vs
5 - Davis, Pat & Scott, George

Board 5

NS EW NS Score EW Score Contract Declarer Pairs
2 2 50 -50 2 - Young, Judy & Manzi, Judy vs
2 - Gagliano, Victor & McKim, Don
1 8 -300 300 1 - Rumsey, Tish & Ruark, Beverlee vs
8 - Cruse, Jane & Smith, Nancy
8 6 100 -100 8 - Tempel, John & Tempel, Pam vs
6 - Bridgers, Remae & Daniels, Gene
7 3 100 -100 7 - Strobel, Caroline & Garst, John vs
3 - Stapler, E J & Boggan, Peggy
6 1 -100 100 6 - Simpson, Mike & Healey, Joan vs
1 - Bradford, Gayle & Bradford, Stephen
5 7 100 -100 5 - Hugunine, Fran & Baxter, Marsha vs
7 - Denman, Carole & Cernogorsky, Carol
3 4 -130 130 3 - Dean, David & Loo, Maisie vs
4 - Deruelle, Ken & Lee, Marcia
4 5 -200 200 4 - Parker, Betty & Hannah, Bonnie vs
5 - Davis, Pat & Scott, George

Board 6

NS EW NS Score EW Score Contract Declarer Pairs
2 2 -80 80 2 - Young, Judy & Manzi, Judy vs
2 - Gagliano, Victor & McKim, Don
1 8 -110 110 1 - Rumsey, Tish & Ruark, Beverlee vs
8 - Cruse, Jane & Smith, Nancy
8 6 100 -100 8 - Tempel, John & Tempel, Pam vs
6 - Bridgers, Remae & Daniels, Gene
7 3 200 -200 7 - Strobel, Caroline & Garst, John vs
3 - Stapler, E J & Boggan, Peggy
6 1 200 -200 6 - Simpson, Mike & Healey, Joan vs
1 - Bradford, Gayle & Bradford, Stephen
5 7 200 -200 5 - Hugunine, Fran & Baxter, Marsha vs
7 - Denman, Carole & Cernogorsky, Carol
3 4 300 -300 3 - Dean, David & Loo, Maisie vs
4 - Deruelle, Ken & Lee, Marcia
4 5 300 -300 4 - Parker, Betty & Hannah, Bonnie vs
5 - Davis, Pat & Scott, George

Board 7

NS EW NS Score EW Score Contract Declarer Pairs
3 3 -170 170 3 - Dean, David & Loo, Maisie vs
3 - Stapler, E J & Boggan, Peggy
4 4 150 -150 4 - Parker, Betty & Hannah, Bonnie vs
4 - Deruelle, Ken & Lee, Marcia
2 1 100 -100 2 - Young, Judy & Manzi, Judy vs
1 - Bradford, Gayle & Bradford, Stephen
1 7 -170 170 1 - Rumsey, Tish & Ruark, Beverlee vs
7 - Denman, Carole & Cernogorsky, Carol
8 5 600 -600 8 - Tempel, John & Tempel, Pam vs
5 - Davis, Pat & Scott, George
7 2 100 -100 7 - Strobel, Caroline & Garst, John vs
2 - Gagliano, Victor & McKim, Don
6 8 -790 790 6 - Simpson, Mike & Healey, Joan vs
8 - Cruse, Jane & Smith, Nancy
5 6 130 -130 5 - Hugunine, Fran & Baxter, Marsha vs
6 - Bridgers, Remae & Daniels, Gene

Board 8

NS EW NS Score EW Score Contract Declarer Pairs
3 3 -50 50 3 - Dean, David & Loo, Maisie vs
3 - Stapler, E J & Boggan, Peggy
4 4 -50 50 4 - Parker, Betty & Hannah, Bonnie vs
4 - Deruelle, Ken & Lee, Marcia
2 1 90 -90 2 - Young, Judy & Manzi, Judy vs
1 - Bradford, Gayle & Bradford, Stephen
1 7 -100 100 1 - Rumsey, Tish & Ruark, Beverlee vs
7 - Denman, Carole & Cernogorsky, Carol
8 5 420 -420 8 - Tempel, John & Tempel, Pam vs
5 - Davis, Pat & Scott, George
7 2 -50 50 7 - Strobel, Caroline & Garst, John vs
2 - Gagliano, Victor & McKim, Don
6 8 430 -430 6 - Simpson, Mike & Healey, Joan vs
8 - Cruse, Jane & Smith, Nancy
5 6 110 -110 5 - Hugunine, Fran & Baxter, Marsha vs
6 - Bridgers, Remae & Daniels, Gene

Board 9

NS EW NS Score EW Score Contract Declarer Pairs
3 3 -50 50 3 - Dean, David & Loo, Maisie vs
3 - Stapler, E J & Boggan, Peggy
4 4 420 -420 4 - Parker, Betty & Hannah, Bonnie vs
4 - Deruelle, Ken & Lee, Marcia
2 1 140 -140 2 - Young, Judy & Manzi, Judy vs
1 - Bradford, Gayle & Bradford, Stephen
1 7 420 -420 1 - Rumsey, Tish & Ruark, Beverlee vs
7 - Denman, Carole & Cernogorsky, Carol
8 5 -50 50 8 - Tempel, John & Tempel, Pam vs
5 - Davis, Pat & Scott, George
7 2 -50 50 7 - Strobel, Caroline & Garst, John vs
2 - Gagliano, Victor & McKim, Don
6 8 420 -420 6 - Simpson, Mike & Healey, Joan vs
8 - Cruse, Jane & Smith, Nancy
5 6 -100 100 5 - Hugunine, Fran & Baxter, Marsha vs
6 - Bridgers, Remae & Daniels, Gene

Board 10

NS EW NS Score EW Score Contract Declarer Pairs
5 5 -170 170 5 - Hugunine, Fran & Baxter, Marsha vs
5 - Davis, Pat & Scott, George
3 2 -170 170 3 - Dean, David & Loo, Maisie vs
2 - Gagliano, Victor & McKim, Don
4 3 -620 620 4 - Parker, Betty & Hannah, Bonnie vs
3 - Stapler, E J & Boggan, Peggy
2 8 -140 140 2 - Young, Judy & Manzi, Judy vs
8 - Cruse, Jane & Smith, Nancy
1 6 -170 170 1 - Rumsey, Tish & Ruark, Beverlee vs
6 - Bridgers, Remae & Daniels, Gene
8 4 -170 170 8 - Tempel, John & Tempel, Pam vs
4 - Deruelle, Ken & Lee, Marcia
7 1 -140 140 7 - Strobel, Caroline & Garst, John vs
1 - Bradford, Gayle & Bradford, Stephen
6 7 -200 200 6 - Simpson, Mike & Healey, Joan vs
7 - Denman, Carole & Cernogorsky, Carol

Board 11

NS EW NS Score EW Score Contract Declarer Pairs
5 5 230 -230 5 - Hugunine, Fran & Baxter, Marsha vs
5 - Davis, Pat & Scott, George
3 2 480 -480 3 - Dean, David & Loo, Maisie vs
2 - Gagliano, Victor & McKim, Don
4 3 520 -520 4 - Parker, Betty & Hannah, Bonnie vs
3 - Stapler, E J & Boggan, Peggy
2 8 480 -480 2 - Young, Judy & Manzi, Judy vs
8 - Cruse, Jane & Smith, Nancy
1 6 520 -520 1 - Rumsey, Tish & Ruark, Beverlee vs
6 - Bridgers, Remae & Daniels, Gene
8 4 480 -480 8 - Tempel, John & Tempel, Pam vs
4 - Deruelle, Ken & Lee, Marcia
7 1 520 -520 7 - Strobel, Caroline & Garst, John vs
1 - Bradford, Gayle & Bradford, Stephen
6 7 980 -980 6 - Simpson, Mike & Healey, Joan vs
7 - Denman, Carole & Cernogorsky, Carol

Board 12

NS EW NS Score EW Score Contract Declarer Pairs
5 5 -400 400 5 - Hugunine, Fran & Baxter, Marsha vs
5 - Davis, Pat & Scott, George
3 2 -90 90 3 - Dean, David & Loo, Maisie vs
2 - Gagliano, Victor & McKim, Don
4 3 -430 430 4 - Parker, Betty & Hannah, Bonnie vs
3 - Stapler, E J & Boggan, Peggy
2 8 -400 400 2 - Young, Judy & Manzi, Judy vs
8 - Cruse, Jane & Smith, Nancy
1 6 50 -50 1 - Rumsey, Tish & Ruark, Beverlee vs
6 - Bridgers, Remae & Daniels, Gene
8 4 -400 400 8 - Tempel, John & Tempel, Pam vs
4 - Deruelle, Ken & Lee, Marcia
7 1 50 -50 7 - Strobel, Caroline & Garst, John vs
1 - Bradford, Gayle & Bradford, Stephen
6 7 -120 120 6 - Simpson, Mike & Healey, Joan vs
7 - Denman, Carole & Cernogorsky, Carol

Board 13

NS EW NS Score EW Score Contract Declarer Pairs
6 6 650 -650 6 - Simpson, Mike & Healey, Joan vs
6 - Bridgers, Remae & Daniels, Gene
5 4 230 -230 5 - Hugunine, Fran & Baxter, Marsha vs
4 - Deruelle, Ken & Lee, Marcia
3 1 620 -620 3 - Dean, David & Loo, Maisie vs
1 - Bradford, Gayle & Bradford, Stephen
4 2 690 -690 4 - Parker, Betty & Hannah, Bonnie vs
2 - Gagliano, Victor & McKim, Don
2 7 680 -680 2 - Young, Judy & Manzi, Judy vs
7 - Denman, Carole & Cernogorsky, Carol
1 5 680 -680 1 - Rumsey, Tish & Ruark, Beverlee vs
5 - Davis, Pat & Scott, George
8 3 620 -620 8 - Tempel, John & Tempel, Pam vs
3 - Stapler, E J & Boggan, Peggy
7 8 650 -650 7 - Strobel, Caroline & Garst, John vs
8 - Cruse, Jane & Smith, Nancy

Board 14

NS EW NS Score EW Score Contract Declarer Pairs
6 6 450 -450 6 - Simpson, Mike & Healey, Joan vs
6 - Bridgers, Remae & Daniels, Gene
5 4 480 -480 5 - Hugunine, Fran & Baxter, Marsha vs
4 - Deruelle, Ken & Lee, Marcia
3 1 450 -450 3 - Dean, David & Loo, Maisie vs
1 - Bradford, Gayle & Bradford, Stephen
4 2 460 -460 4 - Parker, Betty & Hannah, Bonnie vs
2 - Gagliano, Victor & McKim, Don
2 7 430 -430 2 - Young, Judy & Manzi, Judy vs
7 - Denman, Carole & Cernogorsky, Carol
1 5 -50 50 1 - Rumsey, Tish & Ruark, Beverlee vs
5 - Davis, Pat & Scott, George
8 3 450 -450 8 - Tempel, John & Tempel, Pam vs
3 - Stapler, E J & Boggan, Peggy
7 8 480 -480 7 - Strobel, Caroline & Garst, John vs
8 - Cruse, Jane & Smith, Nancy

Board 15

NS EW NS Score EW Score Contract Declarer Pairs
6 6 50 -50 6 - Simpson, Mike & Healey, Joan vs
6 - Bridgers, Remae & Daniels, Gene
5 4 -400 400 5 - Hugunine, Fran & Baxter, Marsha vs
4 - Deruelle, Ken & Lee, Marcia
3 1 100 -100 3 - Dean, David & Loo, Maisie vs
1 - Bradford, Gayle & Bradford, Stephen
4 2 -400 400 4 - Parker, Betty & Hannah, Bonnie vs
2 - Gagliano, Victor & McKim, Don
2 7 -400 400 2 - Young, Judy & Manzi, Judy vs
7 - Denman, Carole & Cernogorsky, Carol
1 5 100 -100 1 - Rumsey, Tish & Ruark, Beverlee vs
5 - Davis, Pat & Scott, George
8 3 -430 430 8 - Tempel, John & Tempel, Pam vs
3 - Stapler, E J & Boggan, Peggy
7 8 -400 400 7 - Strobel, Caroline & Garst, John vs
8 - Cruse, Jane & Smith, Nancy

Board 16

NS EW NS Score EW Score Contract Declarer Pairs
7 7 -120 120 7 - Strobel, Caroline & Garst, John vs
7 - Denman, Carole & Cernogorsky, Carol
6 5 100 -100 6 - Simpson, Mike & Healey, Joan vs
5 - Davis, Pat & Scott, George
5 3 -600 600 5 - Hugunine, Fran & Baxter, Marsha vs
3 - Stapler, E J & Boggan, Peggy
3 8 -150 150 3 - Dean, David & Loo, Maisie vs
8 - Cruse, Jane & Smith, Nancy
4 1 100 -100 4 - Parker, Betty & Hannah, Bonnie vs
1 - Bradford, Gayle & Bradford, Stephen
2 6 -150 150 2 - Young, Judy & Manzi, Judy vs
6 - Bridgers, Remae & Daniels, Gene
1 4 200 -200 1 - Rumsey, Tish & Ruark, Beverlee vs
4 - Deruelle, Ken & Lee, Marcia
8 2 100 -100 8 - Tempel, John & Tempel, Pam vs
2 - Gagliano, Victor & McKim, Don

Board 17

NS EW NS Score EW Score Contract Declarer Pairs
7 7 -50 50 7 - Strobel, Caroline & Garst, John vs
7 - Denman, Carole & Cernogorsky, Carol
6 5 -110 110 6 - Simpson, Mike & Healey, Joan vs
5 - Davis, Pat & Scott, George
5 3 50 -50 5 - Hugunine, Fran & Baxter, Marsha vs
3 - Stapler, E J & Boggan, Peggy
3 8 100 -100 3 - Dean, David & Loo, Maisie vs
8 - Cruse, Jane & Smith, Nancy
4 1 -150 150 4 - Parker, Betty & Hannah, Bonnie vs
1 - Bradford, Gayle & Bradford, Stephen
2 6 -110 110 2 - Young, Judy & Manzi, Judy vs
6 - Bridgers, Remae & Daniels, Gene
1 4 -50 50 1 - Rumsey, Tish & Ruark, Beverlee vs
4 - Deruelle, Ken & Lee, Marcia
8 2 -140 140 8 - Tempel, John & Tempel, Pam vs
2 - Gagliano, Victor & McKim, Don

Board 18

NS EW NS Score EW Score Contract Declarer Pairs
7 7 50 -50 7 - Strobel, Caroline & Garst, John vs
7 - Denman, Carole & Cernogorsky, Carol
6 5 -80 80 6 - Simpson, Mike & Healey, Joan vs
5 - Davis, Pat & Scott, George
5 3 110 -110 5 - Hugunine, Fran & Baxter, Marsha vs
3 - Stapler, E J & Boggan, Peggy
3 8 -100 100 3 - Dean, David & Loo, Maisie vs
8 - Cruse, Jane & Smith, Nancy
4 1 50 -50 4 - Parker, Betty & Hannah, Bonnie vs
1 - Bradford, Gayle & Bradford, Stephen
2 6 -120 120 2 - Young, Judy & Manzi, Judy vs
6 - Bridgers, Remae & Daniels, Gene
1 4 -110 110 1 - Rumsey, Tish & Ruark, Beverlee vs
4 - Deruelle, Ken & Lee, Marcia
8 2 110 -110 8 - Tempel, John & Tempel, Pam vs
2 - Gagliano, Victor & McKim, Don

Board 19

NS EW NS Score EW Score Contract Declarer Pairs
7 6 420 -420 7 - Strobel, Caroline & Garst, John vs
6 - Bridgers, Remae & Daniels, Gene
6 4 140 -140 6 - Simpson, Mike & Healey, Joan vs
4 - Deruelle, Ken & Lee, Marcia
5 2 170 -170 5 - Hugunine, Fran & Baxter, Marsha vs
2 - Gagliano, Victor & McKim, Don
3 7 -50 50 3 - Dean, David & Loo, Maisie vs
7 - Denman, Carole & Cernogorsky, Carol
4 8 400 -400 4 - Parker, Betty & Hannah, Bonnie vs
8 - Cruse, Jane & Smith, Nancy
2 5 450 -450 2 - Young, Judy & Manzi, Judy vs
5 - Davis, Pat & Scott, George
1 3 -50 50 1 - Rumsey, Tish & Ruark, Beverlee vs
3 - Stapler, E J & Boggan, Peggy
8 1 420 -420 8 - Tempel, John & Tempel, Pam vs
1 - Bradford, Gayle & Bradford, Stephen

Board 20

NS EW NS Score EW Score Contract Declarer Pairs
7 6 70 -70 7 - Strobel, Caroline & Garst, John vs
6 - Bridgers, Remae & Daniels, Gene
6 4 -100 100 6 - Simpson, Mike & Healey, Joan vs
4 - Deruelle, Ken & Lee, Marcia
5 2 70 -70 5 - Hugunine, Fran & Baxter, Marsha vs
2 - Gagliano, Victor & McKim, Don
3 7 140 -140 3 - Dean, David & Loo, Maisie vs
7 - Denman, Carole & Cernogorsky, Carol
4 8 110 -110 4 - Parker, Betty & Hannah, Bonnie vs
8 - Cruse, Jane & Smith, Nancy
2 5 -140 140 2 - Young, Judy & Manzi, Judy vs
5 - Davis, Pat & Scott, George
1 3 140 -140 1 - Rumsey, Tish & Ruark, Beverlee vs
3 - Stapler, E J & Boggan, Peggy
8 1 -110 110 8 - Tempel, John & Tempel, Pam vs
1 - Bradford, Gayle & Bradford, Stephen

Board 21

NS EW NS Score EW Score Contract Declarer Pairs
7 6 -490 490 7 - Strobel, Caroline & Garst, John vs
6 - Bridgers, Remae & Daniels, Gene
6 4 -490 490 6 - Simpson, Mike & Healey, Joan vs
4 - Deruelle, Ken & Lee, Marcia
5 2 -400 400 5 - Hugunine, Fran & Baxter, Marsha vs
2 - Gagliano, Victor & McKim, Don
3 7 -490 490 3 - Dean, David & Loo, Maisie vs
7 - Denman, Carole & Cernogorsky, Carol
4 8 -400 400 4 - Parker, Betty & Hannah, Bonnie vs
8 - Cruse, Jane & Smith, Nancy
2 5 50 -50 2 - Young, Judy & Manzi, Judy vs
5 - Davis, Pat & Scott, George
1 3 -490 490 1 - Rumsey, Tish & Ruark, Beverlee vs
3 - Stapler, E J & Boggan, Peggy
8 1 -210 210 8 - Tempel, John & Tempel, Pam vs
1 - Bradford, Gayle & Bradford, Stephen

Board 22

NS EW NS Score EW Score Contract Declarer Pairs
8 8 200 -200 8 - Tempel, John & Tempel, Pam vs
8 - Cruse, Jane & Smith, Nancy
7 5 -150 150 7 - Strobel, Caroline & Garst, John vs
5 - Davis, Pat & Scott, George
6 3 -50 50 6 - Simpson, Mike & Healey, Joan vs
3 - Stapler, E J & Boggan, Peggy
5 1 100 -100 5 - Hugunine, Fran & Baxter, Marsha vs
1 - Bradford, Gayle & Bradford, Stephen
3 6 110 -110 3 - Dean, David & Loo, Maisie vs
6 - Bridgers, Remae & Daniels, Gene
4 7 -50 50 4 - Parker, Betty & Hannah, Bonnie vs
7 - Denman, Carole & Cernogorsky, Carol
2 4 -180 180 2 - Young, Judy & Manzi, Judy vs
4 - Deruelle, Ken & Lee, Marcia
1 2 110 -110 1 - Rumsey, Tish & Ruark, Beverlee vs
2 - Gagliano, Victor & McKim, Don

Board 23

NS EW NS Score EW Score Contract Declarer Pairs
8 8 -110 110 8 - Tempel, John & Tempel, Pam vs
8 - Cruse, Jane & Smith, Nancy
7 5 -200 200 7 - Strobel, Caroline & Garst, John vs
5 - Davis, Pat & Scott, George
6 3 100 -100 6 - Simpson, Mike & Healey, Joan vs
3 - Stapler, E J & Boggan, Peggy
5 1 110 -110 5 - Hugunine, Fran & Baxter, Marsha vs
1 - Bradford, Gayle & Bradford, Stephen
3 6 110 -110 3 - Dean, David & Loo, Maisie vs
6 - Bridgers, Remae & Daniels, Gene
4 7 -140 140 4 - Parker, Betty & Hannah, Bonnie vs
7 - Denman, Carole & Cernogorsky, Carol
2 4 200 -200 2 - Young, Judy & Manzi, Judy vs
4 - Deruelle, Ken & Lee, Marcia
1 2 300 -300 1 - Rumsey, Tish & Ruark, Beverlee vs
2 - Gagliano, Victor & McKim, Don

Board 24

NS EW NS Score EW Score Contract Declarer Pairs
8 8 110 -110 8 - Tempel, John & Tempel, Pam vs
8 - Cruse, Jane & Smith, Nancy
7 5 130 -130 7 - Strobel, Caroline & Garst, John vs
5 - Davis, Pat & Scott, George
6 3 110 -110 6 - Simpson, Mike & Healey, Joan vs
3 - Stapler, E J & Boggan, Peggy
5 1 100 -100 5 - Hugunine, Fran & Baxter, Marsha vs
1 - Bradford, Gayle & Bradford, Stephen
3 6 130 -130 3 - Dean, David & Loo, Maisie vs
6 - Bridgers, Remae & Daniels, Gene
4 7 -110 110 4 - Parker, Betty & Hannah, Bonnie vs
7 - Denman, Carole & Cernogorsky, Carol
2 4 420 -420 2 - Young, Judy & Manzi, Judy vs
4 - Deruelle, Ken & Lee, Marcia
1 2 170 -170 1 - Rumsey, Tish & Ruark, Beverlee vs
2 - Gagliano, Victor & McKim, Don